Tax non-resident · Sweden · Denmark · Norway · Finland

Buying German property from Scandinavia

Scandinavia is often treated as one case — in financing terms it is four. Sweden and Denmark are the demanding cases, Finland the simplest, and Norway sits apart. This is a non resident mortgage case — financed from Germany, not against it.

Book a call WhatsApp Siegfried

In short

Why is financing from Sweden or Denmark harder than from Norway?

Because income in SEK or DKK from a Swedish or Danish residence is a combination some banks exclude outright in their internal country and currency rules. Norway is EEA but not an EU member and is assessed differently, similar to Switzerland.

Is Finland treated differently from the other Nordic countries?

Yes. Finland uses the euro, so the foreign-currency question disappears entirely and the case sits closer to a domestic one than anywhere else in the region.

Foreign-currency income and the banks that accept it →

How do I finance a German property while living in Sweden, Denmark, Norway or Finland?

Scandinavia is not a single case — the four countries sit far apart. Sweden and Denmark pay in kroner. That makes the income foreign currency: some lenders do not accept income in kroner — others do, but credit it with a safety discount. The circle of lending institutions is therefore narrower. Finland uses the euro and drops out of the foreign-currency question entirely. Norway is EEA but not an EU member state and has to be assessed separately. Anyone living in Sweden or Denmark should therefore not approach the first available bank, but specifically those that know the constellation. A clarifying first conversation quickly shows which category the individual case falls into.

The core point

Why Sweden and Denmark are harder than Norway

It sounds contradictory: the two EU member states in this group are the more demanding cases for a German mortgage. The reason lies in the lending policies of the banks, not in the countries themselves. The income currencies we place are listed on the non-resident page.

For a residence in Sweden (SEK) or Denmark (DKK) it is the country of residence, not the salary currency, that decides how a bank files the case. Some institutions do not accept that constellation at all; others do, with a safety discount on the income converted into euros. The consequence: the pool of lenders is narrower and has to be selected in a targeted way.

Norway is EEA but not an EU member state and is assessed differently — similar to Switzerland, which for the same reason is often easier to finance than its reputation suggests. Finland uses the euro; the foreign-currency question disappears entirely and the case sits closer to a domestic one than anywhere else in the region.

Overview

The four countries compared

Sweden — EU, krona (SEK): not every bank accepts this residence. Foreign-currency income with a discount. Narrower pool of lenders, targeted selection needed.
Denmark — EU, krone (DKK): as Sweden. The currency's peg to the euro does not change how banks classify the case.
Norway — EEA, krone (NOK): not an EU member state. Different classification, to be assessed case by case; foreign-currency income remains a factor.
Finland — EU, euro: no foreign-currency question. The most straightforward case in the group.

Anyone living in Stockholm or Copenhagen who approaches the first available bank therefore often receives a rejection that says nothing about their creditworthiness — only that this institution does not handle the constellation.

Practice

What this means for your application

Sequence decides. First we establish which institutions accept your residence-currency combination at all, then we calculate — not the other way round. A rejection from the wrong institution costs time and, across several successive applications, leaves traces in your credit record.

Mixed cases are common: a German couple with one income in SEK and one in euro, a returner on a fixed-term contract in Denmark, a self-employed person with a Norwegian company. These are often easier to finance than the pure case — if they are presented properly.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Why is Sweden harder than Switzerland?

Because a Swedish residence with income in kronor is a combination several lenders exclude in their internal country and currency rules, while a Swiss residence is accepted more widely. It narrows the pool of banks for a Swedish residence.

I live in Finland — do special rules apply to me?

Barely. Finland uses the euro, so the foreign-currency question falls away. What remains is the general non-resident status with the usual requirements on equity and documentation.

A couple with income in two currencies — does that work?

Yes, and often better than purely foreign-currency income. A euro income in the household defuses the currency question noticeably. What matters is how the incomes are presented in the application.

Does this also apply to Iceland?

Iceland, like Norway, is EEA and not EU. The classification is therefore similar to Norway, though the practical pool of lenders is considerably smaller. We clarify that case by case in advance.

Other countries of residence